형제모임에서 환난전 휴거에 반대한 사람들

[엘리야후]

형제모임에서 환난전 휴거에 반대한 사람들

형제모임 하면 세대주의의 아성이고 환난전 휴거를 믿고 주장하는 사람들로 가득찬 것으로

많은 사람들이 오해하고 있습니다만, 그들 중에 상당수가 환난전 휴거에 반대하였습니다.

그 대표적 인물이 바로 죠지 뮐러이며 다음은 로버트 채프만, 허드슨 테일러, 벤자민 뉴튼,

트레겔레스를 들수 있습니다. 제임스 덱크 (James Deck) 는 매우 훌륭한 찬송가 작가였으며

오늘날 그가 작시한 여러 찬송가는 형제모임의 예배찬송가에서 애창되고 있습니다.

그는 다비가 자꾸만 자기 편에 서기를 강권하므로 아예 뉴질랜드로 이민을 가버렸습니다.

그는 그 어느 쪽의 논쟁에도 가담하고 싶지 않았던 것으로 짐작됩니다.

죠지 뮐러는 이렇게 말하였습니다.

  “ 내 형제여, 나는 성경의 꾸준한 독자이네 그리고

곧 발견하는 것은 다비가 믿으라고 가르친 것은 내 성경이 말하는 것과

항상 일치하지는 않는다는 것이네. 그러므로 나는 존 다비가 말하는 것과

 헤어지든지 성경과 헤어지든지 해야 한다네. 그리하여 나는 성경에 충직히

붙어있기를 택하고 다비로부터 떠나기를 택하였다네.

(로버트 카메론이 인용한 “”주님의 오심에 관한 성경적 진리 “”146-7 페이지)

로버트 채프만은 99세 5개월을 건강하게 살았던 사람으로 다비에게서도 많은 칭찬을

받았던 사람이며 형제모임에서 크게 존경받는 사람이었습니다.

그의 삶의 신조는 다음과 같이 말한 것으로 유명합니다.

“ 그리스도를 믿는다는 사람들은 많습니다. 그러나 진정으로 거듭난 그리스도인들은 적습니다.

그중에서도 그리스도처럼 사는 사람들은  참으로 적습니다.

저는 예수 그리스도 처럼 사는 것으로 예수 그리스도를 증거하는 것을 저의 삶의

최대의 목표로 삼았습니다”

로버트 채프만의 예배 찬송곡들과 여러 글들은 참으로 그의 고상한 인격을 말해줍니다.

그는 참으로 위대한 그리스도인이었습니다.

채프만은 성경이 지구상에 대환난이 있기 전에 비밀리에 휴거가 있을 것이라고 가르친다고 믿지 않았습니다.

형제모임 외에서 환난전 휴거를 믿지 않은 사람들로는 스펄젼, 워치만 니, 로버트 카메론

등을 들수 있습니다.

이 환난전 휴거 이론은 1827년 이후 존 넬슨 다비에 의해 본격적으로 주장되기 시작하였으므로

그 이전의 신자들에게서 이에 대해 명확히 반대한 주장을 찾아보기 쉽지 않지만 그

이전의 믿는 자들 중에 요한 웨슬레등은 이러한 견해와 다른 믿음을 가졌음을 알아볼 수 있습니다.

오늘날 처럼 형제모임이 거의 교단 교리로, 환난전 휴거 이론을 붙들게 된 것은 1890-1900년 무렵에 있었던 나이아가라 성경회의 시대이후로 짐작됩니다. 그 이전에 Cyrus Ingerson Scofield 가 그의 관주 성경에 이러한 휴거 개념을 넣으면서 더욱 보급되었고, Lewis Sperry Chafer 가 그와 함께 동역하며 스코필드를 멘토로 삼았고 달라스 신학교를 설립하고 초대 학장이 되면서 세대주의 신학을 보급시키던 시기에 크게 보급되어 마치 성경에서 명시한 진리인양 보급되었습니다.

그러나 그러한 해석은 형제모임이 문자적 성경해석을 중시하는  그 원칙에서 벗어난 것이며, 일종의 유추 해석이 많이 적용된 것을 알수 있습니다. 예컨대 사도 요한에게 이리로 올라오라 하신 계시록 4장 1절의 말씀이 모든 신약교회가 휴거되는 것을 대표하여 올라간 것이라고 해석하는 것입니다. 그러나 모든 신약교회가 휴거되는 장면은 성경 어디에도 나오지 않습니다. 심지어 두 사람의 휴거 장면은 성경에 명시되어 있습니다. 계 11장 11-13절이 그것을 말해줍니다. 그러나 그토록 수많은 신약교회의 휴거는 직접 언급된 구절이 전혀 없습니다.

스코필드는 카톨릭 교도인 아내와 결혼하였으나 술주정이 심하여 아내와 이혼하였고 성직자 제도를 좇았으며 그가 정부 변호사로 있던 시절에는 횡령의 문제를 일으키기도 하였습니다.

그에 앞서 세대주의 이론을 폈던 존 넬슨 다비는 유아침례를 주장하여 오늘날까지 프랑스의 다비파 모임은 유아침례를 실시하고 있는데, 유아침례는 수십억의 어린이들을 믿음 없이도 구원얻은 그리스도인이 된 것처럼 오해하게 하는 사탄의 고등전술입니다.

오늘날 형제모임이 유아침례를 배척하게 된것은 1860년무렵의 스코틀랜드 형제모임의 각성과 운동의 결과라고 믿어집니다.

그러므로 우리는 환난전 휴거이론은 성경이 직접 가르친 교훈이 아니라, 성경을 이용하여 인간들이 도출해낸 이론임을 깨달아야 할 것입니다.

다음은 일부 언급 들을 발췌한 내용들입니다.

Brethren who opposed to the Pre-tribulation  Rapture ( Rapture before Tribulation)

George Muller (1805-1898)  죠지 뮐러

Though the pre-tribulational rapture doctrine gained momentum as a result of the literature of the Brethren movement, Müller's church was wary of such teachings. George Müller held to a Post Tribulation Rapture doctrine along with others such as Benjamin Wills Newton and Samuel Prideaux Tregelles,^[39] and said that "scripture declares plainly that the Lord Jesus will not come until the Apostasy shall have taken place, and the man of sin shall have been revealed..."^[

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_M%C3%BCller

George Mueller said: "My brother I am a constant reader of the Bible, and I soon found out what I was taught to believe (by Darby's doctrine) did not always agree with what my Bible said. I came to see I must either part company with what John Darby, or my precious Bible, and I chose to cling to my Bible and part from Mr. Darby." - George Mueller, a contemporary and one time supporter of John Nelson Darby quoted by Robert Cameron, Scriptural Truth About the Lord's Return, pp. 146-7.

죠지 뮐러는 말하기를 “ 내 형제여, 나는 성경의 꾸준한 독자이네 그리고

곧 발견하는 것은 다비가 믿으라고 가르친 것은 내 성경이 말하는 것과

항상 일치하지는 않는다는 것이네. 그러므로 나는 존 다비가 말하는 것과

헤어지든지 성경과 헤어지든지 해야 한다네. 그리하여 나는 성경에 충직히

붙어있기를 택하고 다비로부터 떠나기를 택하였다네.

(로버트 카메론이 인용한 “”주님의 오심에 관한 성경적 진리 “”146-7 페이지)

http://biblocality.com/forums/showthread.php?3658-George-Mueller

Can anyone come to believe in a Pre-Tribulation Rapture and Invisible Coming just by reading the Bible?

No. A Pre-Tribulation Rapture and invisible Coming of Christ must be taught from an extra-Biblical system of theology called Dispensationalim. It was invented in the mid-nineteenth century by one man: John Nelson Darby. No one in the Evangelical Church believed these doctrines as they are widely taught today before Darby. None of the great Evangelical teachers and preachers ever saw these doctrines in the Scriptures before this; not Martin Luther, John Calvin, John Wesley, George Whitfield, Charles Finney, George Mueller or Charles Spurgeon. Darby singlehandidly brought them into the Evangelical Church by very aggressively pushing them on some of the most prominent ministers of his time like the influential founders of Moody Bible Institute and the Dallas Theological Seminary. Dispensationalism was then popularized by C.I. Scofield, who created a Bible that taught it within its pages, right below the text. While Darby and Scofield brought many important Scriptural teaching to light, especially in the areas of systematic study and eschatology, they too often went beyond clear Biblical teaching to contrive dogmas that neither Christ, nor the Apostles, nor the Prophets ever taught.

Once the dominos of unbiblical claims start to fall from the false Pre-Tribulation rapture theory, they seem to go on and on. These are just some of the contradictions and problems with pre-tribulation rapture theory.

http://freestockphotos.com/COMING1/PreTribRapture.htm

George Müller held to a Post Tribulation Rapture doctrine along with others such as Benjamin Wills Newton and Samuel Prideaux Tregelles and said that “scripture declares plainly that the Lord Jesus will not come until the Apostacy shall have taken place, and the man of sin shall have been revealed

죠지 뮐러는 다른 사람들 곧 벤쟈민 뉴튼, 사무엘 트레겔레스와 함께

환난후 휴거를 붙들었다 “ 성경은 명백하게 주 예수께서 배도가 발생한

이후에, 죄의 사람이 드러난 이후에,  오신다고 선언한다.” 고 말하였다.

http://habasar.wordpress.com/2009/12/21/conversion-of-another-george-mueller/

Benjamin Newton and Tregelles

Like his cousin by marriage, Benjamin Wills Newton, who was instrumental in Tregelles's conversion and who helped finance publication of his books, Tregelles was a post tribulationist.^[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Prideaux_Tregelles

Robert Chapman (1803-1902)

In regards to the timing of the rapture of the Church, an issue which became prominent within the brethren movement, Chapman held a partial rapture view with part of the saved being raptured before the Great Tribulation and a part of them after the Great Tribulation.^[7]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Chapman_(Plymouth_Brethren)

Concerning Different Understandings of the Rapture
"Chapman, together with George Müller and a small group of leaders among the Brethren, did not believe that the Scriptures told of a secret rapture of all believers before a period of great tribulation on earth. They believed that the church as a whole must go through the period of tribulation" (Peterson, 171).

채프만은 성경이 지구상에 대환난이 있기 전에 비밀리에 휴거가

있을 것이라고 가르친다고 믿지 않았다.

William Hake, Chapman's coworker, did not agree with Chapman's views concerning rapture. When Hake referred to the Lord's coming at any moment to rapture all the believers, Chapman replied, "Well, Brother Hake, I am ready, but it's not in the Bible." It is worth noting that different understandings of the Scriptures did not hinder Hake and Chapman from cooperating in the Lord's service.

“헤이크 형제, 나는 준비되었네, 그렇지만 성경에는 그것이 없다네”

그러한 이견이 헤이크와 채프만이 주님의 사역에서 협동하는 것을

막지 않았다는 것은 주목할 일이다.

http://www.jesusloversincleveland.org/English/journal/vol2no12/Chapman.htm

Hudson Taylor (1832-1905) 허드슨 테일러 (중국 내륙 선교회)

Partial Rapture (부분 휴거_)

Teach that only a small number of Christians in ‘watchfulness and perseverance’ will be rapturedThose not taken in the Rapture will endure the Tribulation as a time of purificationSome believe the 5 foolish virgins (Matt 25:1-13) are carnal Christians left behind to endure the TribulationSome see the Transfiguration as a type of rapture wherein only 3 of the disciples were present while 9 were left behind (Matt17:1-8)Background:First articulated in the mid-19th century by a small group of Pretribulationists in EnglandTheir main publication was

The Dawn

magazine edited by David M. PantonRobert Govett (1813-1901) was the first proponent of the modern theory of partial rapture in 1853George H. Lang was its ablest proponent (1874-1958)Works:George H. Pember (1837-1910), The Great Prophecies (London: R. F. Fleming H. Revell Co., 1912)Robert Govett, Entrance into the Kingdom (London: Charles J. Thynne, 1923)George H. Lang, Firstborn Sons Their Rights and Risks (London: Oliphants Ltd., 1943)David M. Panton (1870-1955), The Letters to the Seven Churches (London: R. F. Hunger Printer, 1912)George L. Rose, Tribulation Till Translation (Glendale, CA: Rose Pub., Co., 1943)Charles H. Welch, The Testimony of the Lord's Prisoner (London: Fred P. Brininger, n.d.)J.W. White JR., The Partial Rapture Theory Explained (2008)Ray Brubaker, Rapture, A Reward for Readiness (2003)Great WhiteThrone judgmenTheological Persuasion:Some are Calvinists and some are ArminiansSome hold to charismatic theologyChurches:Baptist and some charismatic churchesPast Notables:G. H. Lang, Robert Govett, Watchman Nee, Ray Brubaker, Hudson Taylor, Sarah Foulkes Moore, Robert Chapman D. M. Panton (editor of The Dawn

), G.H.Pember, J.A.Seiss, T. Austin SparksRobert Wilkin of Grace Evangelical SocietyA.B. Simpson, founder of the American Christian and Missionary Alliance, taught it in parable of the 10 virgins but was more closelyassociated as a Pre-Millennial HistoricistCurrent Notables:Henry Haney, Troy Brooks (godtube.com), Joey FaustWeb Sites:http://www3.telus.net/trbrooks/Partial_rapture.htmHenry Haney (www.truthablaze.com)Bible Communications, Inc. (http://www.tanbible.com/tol_knw/tol_knw_partrapt.htm)Jack Shelton (http://members.tripod.com/sheltonjack/id38.htm)Anonymous (http://www.kingdom-gospel.com/rapture.html)Ray Brubaker Files (http://www.raptureme.com/featured/brubaker/brubaker.html)Quote:"He gave His disciples no reason to believe that their readiness for the Rapture rested on any experience of salvation theymay have had. He made it pointed and plain that their conduct at the moment of the Rapture meant the winning of the prize.”(Sarah Foulkes Moore,

Herald of His Coming)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13420005/Synopsis-of-the-End-Times

Other than Plymouth Brethren

Watchman Nee : Partial Rapture

Rapture

By Watchman Nee

In order to understand Matthew 24 and 25, it is essential to have a clear knowledge of the subject of rapture. For it is one of the most important matters in this last hour. Unfortunately it is greatly misunderstood by many. Rapture is the same as the word “receive” found in John 14.1-3. It does not signify the idea of “climbing up” to heaven but of the Lord receiving us to heaven. Hence rapture is a specific term used to denote His receiving us at His soon return.

There are different views on rapture among believers. Some say (1) that the whole body of the saved will be raptured before the Great Tribulation; others believe (2) that the whole body of the saved must go through the Great Tribulation before they are raptured; while still others feel (3) that a part of the saved will be raptured before the Great Tribulation and a part of them will be raptured after the Great Tribulation. There are mainly these three schools of interpretation on the subject; yet merely because any one of them is different from the one you hold to does not give you any warrant to denounce the different view as heresy. It is wrong to withhold fellowship simply for this reason. Well-known believers are found in all three schools.

Of the first school mentioned, names can be cited such as J. N. Darby, William Kelly (C. H. Spurgeon once said that Kelly’s brain was as large as the universe), R. A. Torrey (who later changed to a post-tribulation rapture view), Phillips Brooks, James Gray, Arno G. Gaebelein, J. A. Seiss, C. I. Scofield, and so forth. Of the second school, there could be listed such names as George Muller (who first believed in pre-tribulation rapture), A.J. Gordon of Boston, A. B. Simpson, W. J. Erdman, W. G. Moorehead, Henry Frost of Canada, James Wright, Benjamin Newton, and so on. And as to the third school, we have names such as Hudson Taylor, Robert Chapman, Robert Govett (Spurgeon praised his writings as having light a century ahead of his time and as being full of gold), G. H. Pember, D. M. Panton (the “prince of prophecy”) and others. None of the three schools can completely ignore the others, yet only one is correct. Let us therefore examine them with fairness, having the attitude of a judge and not that of a lawyer.

http://www3.telus.net/trbrooks/Partial_rapture.htm

 Corrie Ten Boom

The "witness under trial" issue was of major concern to evangelist Corrie Ten Boom, whose family suffered in Nazi prison camps during World War II for the crime of protecting Jews. Corrie Ten Boom preached that the pre-tribulation rapture would leave the Christian church ill-prepared for witness under persecution, just as it had in China when Mao Zedong rose to power, and warned that pre-tribulationism was the sort of false doctrine that Jesus warned about.

Another idea is that following the Great Tribulation, the False Prophet, or "The Beast out of the Earth" and the Antichrist or "The Beast out of the Sea" will be condemned upon Jesus Christ's return, and all those who endured or died for Christ's return will be raptured to heaven and, following the Millennium, Satan will be condemned and the remaining dead believers will be raised and raptured into the new heaven.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Tribulation_Rapture

Robert Cameron ( Canadian Baptist Pastor 1845-1922)

Robert Cameron, of Watchword and Truth, whose later life was largely a proselyting campaign for post-tribulationalism, used to claim that Dr. Brookes, of St. Louis, had given up this hope “before he died, in an interview with him!” But both the last books and the later associates of Dr. Brookes deny this. Others claimed that Prof. W. G. Moorehead gave it up, etc., etc. Someone told me that R. A. Torrey weakened. I challenged him. He could produce no proof whatever! Mrs. Torrey, when told that a Canadian magazine had claimed that her husband had given up the hope of Christ’s coming for the whole Church, was much distressed, and wrote the editor to publish her denial of such a false report. [10]

Much capital has been made of the fact that the revered George Muller of Bristol, misled by the mistranslation above alluded to [“day of Christ” in 2 Thess. 2:2, instead of “day of the Lord”] declared his belief that the Church would go through the Great Tribulation. He is quoted by Mr. Scruby as one of his witnesses [as also by Reese, Cameron, Fraser, et al.]. What was the result of this unfortunate mistake of beloved George Muller? I speak now from personal knowledge. The truth of the coming of the Lord was tabooed at Bethesda, where I was brought up, and was for many years a member and most regular attendant at the services. But I never once heard Mr. Muller or any other preacher say that they believed the Church would go through the Great Tribulation. And what is more, long after I had left Bristol Mr. Muller at the last conference at which he spoke said plainly that he believed the Lord might come at any moment.... Mr. Muller evidently changed his opinion a second time, which he would do, for he “could do nothing knowingly against the Truth.”

C. H. Spurgeon is another of Mr. Scruby’s [and Reese’s, etc.] supposed supporters. That mighty man of valor was not ashamed to confess publicly that he once believed the Lord would not return till the world was converted, but that he came to see that this could not be done in “an eternity and a half.” Mr. Spurgeon did not then believe the Lord would come before the Tribulation, but I heard Mr. Spurgeon at the Tabernacle not long before he died. It was at a conference on the coming of the Lord. Other speakers were Dr. Alexander Maclaren and Dr. John McNeill, and the impression left on my mind in the absence of any statement to the contrary was that all the speakers believed in the imminent coming of the Lord without any premonitary signs or the revelation of Antichrist. These facts show how futile it is to rest our faith on what great men may have believed. The greater the man the more ready he will be to revise his conclusions if he receives fresh light from the Word of God. [11]

http://www.bereanwatchmen.com/kept-from-the-hour/chapter-ten-the-post-tribulation-rapture-theory.html

Sir Robert regarded Cameron's Post-Tribulation-Rapturism as the heretical notion of a mere American, therefore beneath the notice of Britishers, yet the

great part of what little literature I have seen on the subject is by Englishmen--

S.P. Tregelles, the greatest Bible scholar that country has produced, Edward

Shackleton, Frank H. White and others, while Spurgeon, England's greatest preacher,

and George Muller, the modern world's greatest "faith" man, both staunch Post-

Tribulation-Rapturists, were then residing on that "side of the Atlantic". And I,

too, was a British subject, living in England,

http//.rediscoveringthebible.com/Scruby2.pdf

Charles Haddon Spurgeon : Premillennial, Post-Tribulation Rapture

Charles Haddon Spurgeon was not known to be one who spoke extensively on the end times. But what he did say perfectly parallels the sequence of events presented in this book. Thus in his sermon on "The Joyful Anticipation of the Second Advent" Spurgeon taught the events of the end times would occur according to the following order:

The great tribulation by Antichrist
"First, then here is a terrible time . . .a time of fearful national trouble."

Then the signs appear in the heavens
"When the Lord Jesus shall come, the heavens shall tell us: 'There shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars.'"

The Rapture and the resurrection of the saints
"And then, ...our own eye shall tell us, for we shall see 'the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.' . . .'Look up, and lift up your heads' . . .because the graves are opening . . . .You will quit the grave never more to die."

http://sixthtrumpet.org/html/SpurgeonandDispensational%20Premillennialism.htm

The Rise of Pretribulationism
A second out-growth of the prophetic awakening of the early nineteenth century was Darbyism, or Dispensationalism, which had its birth within the Plymouth Brethren movement. A pretribulation rapture is an essential element of this system. The Brethren movement had its beginnings in Dublin in 1825 when a small group of earnest men, dissatisfied with the spiritual condition of the Protestant church in Ireland, met for prayer and fellowship. Soon others joined the fellowship and other similar groups sprang up. In 1827, J. N. Darby entered the fellowship. Although there was an interest from the start in prophetic truth, the center of emphasis was "The Nature and Unity of the Church of Christ" (the title of Darby's first tract) in reaction to the deadness and formalism of the organized church and the ordained ministry. Outstanding among the new groups which arose in Ireland and England was the fellowship in Plymouth, from which the movement derived its name. Leader of the Plymouth fellowship for many years was B. W. Newton, a man of considerable learning and scholarship. Two other outstanding Brethren were S. P. Tregelles, recognized by the entire world of Biblical scholarship for his contribution to the study of the history of the Greek text of the New Testament, and George Muller, the great man of prayer.

We have already mentioned the Albury Park conference and the Powerscourt meetings. Darby and other leaders of the new movement attended the meetings at Powerscourt, and Darby's leadership in the area of prophetic interpretation here became evident. It was at Powerscourt that the teaching of a pretribulation rapture of the Church took shape. Tregelles, a member of the Brethren in these early days, tells us that the idea of a secret rapture at a secret coming of Christ had its origin in an "utterance" in Edward Irving's church, and that this was taken to be the voice of the Spirit. Tregelles says, "it was from that supposed revelation that the mortem doctrine and the modern phraseology respecting it arose. It came not from Holy Scripture, but from that which falsely pretended to be the Spirit of God." [S.P. Tregelles, The Hope of Christ's Second Coming, first published in 1864...] This doctrine together with other important modifications of the traditional futuristic view were vigorously promoted by Darby, and they have been popularized by the writings of William Kelly.

Not all of the Brethren accepted the teaching of a pretribulation rapture. In 1842, B. W. Newton of Plymouth published a book entitled Thoughts on the Apocalypse in which he taught the traditional view that the Church would go through the Tribulation. There arose a sharp contention over the issue of pretribulationism between the two men. Newton "considered Mr. Darby's dispensational teaching as the height of speculative nonsense" (H. A. Ironside). He was supported in his posttribulation views by Tregelles. A rift followed which was never healed. This was the first of a series of many contentions which marred the history of the Brethren movement.

This new prophetic emphasis at once found expression‎ in the prophetic and Bible conference movement. A. C. Gaebelein, telling the story of the Scofield Reference Bible, finds its background within this movement. Interest in premillennialism grew to a point where a great prophetic conference was suggested by Nathaniel West. A call was issued by a committee of eight men, among whom were James H. Brookes and A. J. Gordon, with the indorsement of one hundred and fourteen "Bishops, Professors, Ministers and Brethren." The conference was called to meet in the church of the Holy Trinity (Episcopal) in 1878. A second prophetic conference was held in Chicago in 1886. Prominent in these conferences were such men as Stephen Tyng, W. R. Nicholson, Nathaniel West, S. H. Kellogg, A. J. Gordon, James H. Brookes, W. J. Erdman, W. G. Moorehead and A. T. Pierson.

Another series of meetings of even greater importance was that which met at Niagara on Lake Ontario from 1883-1897. This conference was the outgrowth of a small Bible study fellowship initiated in 1875 by a handful of men among whom were Nathaniel West, J. H. Brookes and W. J. Erdman. They were joined the next year by A. J. Gordon. This group met from place to place until the conference at Ontario was undertaken. Among the leading teachers of the Ontario conferences, according to A. C. Gaebelein, were James H. Brookes, A. J. Gordon, W. J. Erdman, Albert Erdman, George C. Needham, A. C. Dickson, L. W. Mundhall, H. M. Parsons, Canon Howitt, E. P. Marvin, Hudson Taylor,J. M. Stifler, Robert Cameron, W. G. Moorehead and A. T. Pierson. After this pioneer of American Bible conferences was discontinued, a new conference at Seacliff, Long Island, was opened in 1901, and it was here that the plan for the Reference Bible embodying the dispensational system of interpretation occurred to Dr. C. I. Scofield.

In view of the modern notion that pretribulationism has been one of the foundational tenets of a, sound presentation of prophetic truth, it is important to note tnat many of the leaders of this early prophetic, Bible conference movement either were or became posttribulatiomsts. Many of the teachers at the Niagara Conference accepted J. N. Darby's pretribulation rapture along with the doctrine of Christ's return. Of the men named above, James H. Brookes, A. T. Pierson, and C. I. Scofield have been among the most influential supporters of this view. However, other teachers did not accept it, and still others accepted it at first only to give it up after more mature study of the Word of God. Since it is often thought that all good and godly premillennialists must be pretribulationists, we shall note the views of several of these leadersjwho did not adhere to the pretribulation teaching

http://gospelpedlar.com/articles/Last%20Things/history_prophecy.html

2012. 7. 22 하토브

2016. 12. 12. 엘리야후

[엘리야후]

이글은 과거에 하토브 이름으로 올려졌으나 다음측의 제재로 더 이상 스크랩이 불가능하게 되어 있어서 약간의 수정과 보충을 거쳐 다시 올립니다.

[세힘]

여리고주막에 공유합니다.

[엘리야후]

위의 본문 글중에서 나오는 중요한 질문이 있습니다. 읽으시는분들 모두에게 해당됩니다.

환난전 휴거 이론을 어떤 인간에게서, 어느 누구에게서 들어보지 않고, 오직 성경만을 읽었을 때, 우리는 환난이 있기 전에 휴거될 것이다, 하는 확신을 얻을 수 있습니까?

어느 누구 인간에게 세뇌되기 전에, 어느 인간이 써놓은 책을 읽고 알기 전에, 오직 성경만을 정독하였더니, 우리는 확실히 환난전에 휴거되는구나, 모든 신약교회의 사람들, 거듭난 이후에도 간음한 목사들도, 거듭난 이후에 세상일락을 좇던 라오디게아 교인들도 환난 전에 모두 휴거된다, 하는 확신을 얻을 수 있었습니까? 하나님이 그리스도인들을 너무나 사랑하기 때문에 !