CAFE

[유도탄]LCS에 Mk.70 컨테이너형 VLS를 통합할 것

작성자위종민|작성시간24.12.13|조회수187 목록 댓글 2

지난 수요일, 곧 퇴임할 카를로스 델 토로 해군장관이 USNI가 개최한 국방포럼에서 LCS가 Mk.70 컨테이너형 VLS를 탑재할 거라고 말했네요. 최대 3개를 탑재할 수 있어 총 12셀을 탑재하게 되네요. 

 

Mk.70 VLS는 대함공격 능력이 있는 SM-6나 토마호크 블록 V를 발사 가능해 LCS의 활용도를 늘릴 수 있습니다. 

 

Littoral Combat Ships Could Come Off the Sidelines With SM-6 Launchers

Littoral Combat Ships Could Come Off the Sidelines With SM-6 Launchers

Destroyer-like armamant, small platform: a Mk 70 containerized launcher fires off an SM-6 from the helideck of LCS USS Savannah, 2023 (USN)

Published Dec 12, 2024 8:42 PM by The Maritime Executive

 

 

The U.S. Navy's undergunned Littoral Combat Ship classes are both about to get a major armament upgrade, according to USNI. At the USNI Defense Forum on Wednesday, outgoing Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro told the audience that many LCS hulls will eventually carry the Mk 70 Payload Delivery System, a containerized version of the standard Mk 41 vertical launch system (VLS).  

The announcement could enhance the LCS' contribution to the high-end fight. The Mk 70 can deploy the anti-air/antiship SM-6 or the antiship-capable Block V Tomahawk (TLAM) cruise missile, and its footprint is no bigger than a single forty-foot container. It was test-fired successfully from the helipad of the Littoral Combat Ship USS Savannah in October 2023, and may have been tested previously in 2022, according to The War Zone. 

Each containerized Mk 70 unit has the equivalent of four VLS cells, and conceptual drawings released by the manufacturer suggest that each LCS might be capable of carrying up to three units. A total of 12 VLS cells would be a small amount of firepower compared to the 90-plus cells aboard an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, but it would still enhance the LCS' reach for a limited strike mission or for self-defense. 

The two distinct LCS classes have no long-range air defense systems of their own, and they rely upon other surface combatants to shield them from the proliferating ballistic-missile and hypersonic threats that confront naval forces today. The addition of the SM-6 could change that equation, so long as the missile receives adequate targeting data (the LCS lacks an onboard AEGIS combat system). 

A supply of Block V Tomahawk missiles would also tip the scales in the LCS' favor. The newest Tomahawk is antiship-capable, and it has an unclassified range of at least 1,000 miles. This is many times greater than the range of the Naval Strike Missiles that Del Toro wants to mount on all remaining LCS hulls - and Tomahawk hits with a far heavier payload.  

Del Toro's Mk 70 concept was received with some skepticism in China, where military analysts have a well-developed interest in U.S. surface warfare capabilities. 

Zhang Junshe, a member of the PLA Naval Military Academic Research Institute, told state outlet Global Times that the Mk 70-LCS combination appears "ambitious in design but constrained in reality." He noted the LCS' small size, limited payload capacity and poor reliability record. 

"Based on the U.S. descriptions, this is a classic example of 'overloading a small cart with a big load,' making it difficult to achieve sufficient combat capability. This warrants further observation," Zhang said. 

 

다음검색
현재 게시글 추가 기능 열기

댓글

댓글 리스트
  • 작성자백선호 | 작성시간 24.12.14 처음에는 연안에 바짝 붙어서 작전할 배를 만든다더니 결국 뒤로 빠져 쏠 수 있는 무장을 달게 되네요.
  • 답댓글 작성자위종민 작성자 본인 여부 작성자 | 작성시간 24.12.16 기획 당시 용도대로 쓰이는 무기들은 배고 비행기고 많이 없는 것 같습니다. 다른 용도로도 잘 쓰일 수 있는지가 중요한 것 같은데, 그런 면에선 공간 넓은 인디펜던스급 LCS가 프리덤급보다는 좀 더 잘 쓰이지 않을까 싶기도 하넹.
댓글 전체보기
맨위로

카페 검색

카페 검색어 입력폼