댓글 리스트
-
작성자 백선호 작성시간24.01.09 ATO는 1991년 걸프전쟁 때 본격적으로 쓰였는데 베트남전쟁 때의 Frag와 비교해 보면 내용은 거의 비슷하다고 합니다.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA451239.pdf
In studying ATO for Desert Storm (figure 26), it becomes clear that the format for the Order has changed from the “Frag” of Vietnam, but the majority of the information remains constant: Mission number, Aircraft type and number, unit, Call sign, Ordnance, Target and Time over Target. There is some additional information such as Identification Codes used for electronically identifying aircraft, exact desired mean points of impact (DMPI) for weapons, -
작성자 백선호 작성시간24.01.09 and remarks used to convey specific instructions from the JFACC staff. Of note, missing in these orders is any conveyance of the commander’s intent for the attacks. In keeping with the AirLand ideals, airpower hit targets listed on the ATO requested by the Army (72 hours prior) beyond the FSCL or during CAS operations as directed by the Forward Air Controller. There was little need for the pilots/aircrews to know “why” or what effect was required for their sortie.