문의>> Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004778
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana-Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Department of Surgery, Carrera 7 No 40-62, Hospital Universitario de San Ignacio, 7 piso, Bogota, Colombia. alvarosanabria@gmail.com
BACKGROUND: Perforated peptic ulcer is a common abdominal disease that is treated by surgery. The development of laparoscopic surgery has changed the way to treat such abdominal surgical emergencies. The results of some clinical trials suggest that laparoscopic surgery could be a better strategy than open surgery in the correction of perforated peptic ulcer but the evidence is not strongly in favour or against this intervention. OBJECTIVES: To measure the effect of laparoscopic surgical treatment versus open surgical treatment in patients with a diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer in relation to abdominal septic complications, surgical wound infection, extra-abdominal complications, hospital length of stay and direct costs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004), PubMed/MEDLINE (1966 to July 2004), EMBASE (1985 to November 2004) and LILACS (1988 to November 2004) as well as reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials comparing laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for the repair of perforated peptic ulcer using any mechanical method of closure (suture, omental patch or fibrin sealant). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Primary outcome measures included proportion of septic and other abdominal complications (surgical site infection, suture leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative ileus) and extra-abdominal complications (pulmonary). Secondary outcomes included mortality, time to return to normal diet, time of nasogastric aspiration, hospital length of stay and costs. Outcomes were summarized by reporting odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, using the fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS: We included two randomised clinical trials, which were of acceptable quality. We found no statistically significant differences between laparoscopic and open surgery in the proportion of abdominal septic complications (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.47), pulmonary complications (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.31) or actual number of septic abdominal complications (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.58). Heterogeneity was significant only for pulmonary complications. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that a decrease in septic abdominal complications may exist when laparoscopic surgery is used to correct perforated peptic ulcer. However, it is necessary to develop more randomised controlled trials that include a greater number of patients to confirm such an assumption, guaranteeing a long learning curve for participating surgeons. With the information provided by the available clinical trials it could be said that laparoscopic surgery results are not clinically different from those of open surgery.
PMID: 16235381 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
②The Cochrane Library에서 바로 검색해서 다운로드 받는 방법.
우리병원 The Cochrane Library으로 접속합니다.
오른쪽 상단의 Search 아래에 네모칸이 두 개 있습니다.
첫번째 네모칸에 CD004778이라고 적은 후에 옆의 네모칸에서 ▼를 클릭해서 DOI로 선택한 후 GO를 눌러줍니다.
검색 결과치가 아래와 같이 나옵니다.
Cochrane Reviews [1] | Other Reviews [0] | Clinical Trials [0] | Methods Studies [0] |
Technology Assessments [0] | Economic Evaluations [0] | Cochrane Groups [0]
AE Sanabria, CH Morales, MI Villegas
Year: 2005
Record
우리병원 The Cochrane Library으로 접속합니다.
오른쪽 상단의 Search 아래에 있는 Advanced Search를 클릭합니다.
| Search For: | In: | |
|---|---|---|
| To search using field labels (e.g. heart:ti) use the Search History page. | ||
빈 네모칸에 " Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease " 라고 적은 후,
바로 옆 네모 칸을 Search All Text ▼ 라고 두고 하단의 Search를 클릭합니다.
②번과 동일한 결과가 나옵니다.
특히 중요 단어가 2 ~ 3개 이상이거나,
정확하게 일치하는 논문 Title을 적어서 결과치를 얻고자 하는 경우,
검색창에 단어를 적을 때 단어의 시작과 끝에 " " 를 꼭 검색창에 적어주시기 바랍니다.
검색창에 " 문장 혹은 단어"를 적은 후 검색을 하면 보다 정확한 결과치를 얻을 수 있습니다.
본원은 EBM DB 두 개를 구독하고 있습니다.
이상 도서실에서 알려드렸습니다.
