CAFE

x-ray,ct, mri 진단

복벽의 두깨, 다열근의 두깨 변화에 따른 요통의 예후에 관한 논문

작성자문형철|작성시간12.11.07|조회수449 목록 댓글 0

복벽의 두깨, 다열근의 두깨와 요부안정성이라.


결론은 균형을 맞추어 co-contraction해라.

그 과정에 관한 논란이다.


초음파로 내외복사근, 다열근은 그 크기를 비교할 수 있고...


첨부파일 Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing 복부 비움운동 동안 복벽두깨의 변화.pdf



첨부파일 복벽두깨에 따른 요통환자의 분석(내외복사근, 다열근 초음파 분석 포함).pdf



첨부파일 건강인 복부hollowing운동시 복벽근육 크기와 비대칭. Mannion.pdf




Are Changes in Pain and Disability After A Programme of “Spine Stabilisation Exercises” Contingent Upon Improvements in the Voluntary Activation of Transversus Abdominis?: Gp123

Mannion, A F; Pulkovski, N*; Caporaso, F*; Sprott, H.*

Free Access
Collapse Box

Author Information

Spine Center, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland

*Department of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have shown that spine stabilisation exercises elicit improvements in symptoms/disability in patients with chronic non‐specific low back pain (cLBP). However, none have corroborated the intended mechanism of action by examining whether these clinical improvements 1) are greater in patients with “dysfunction” of the muscles targeted by the exercises, or 2) correlate with post‐treatment improvements in muscle activation.

Methods: Pre and post‐therapy, 32 cLBP patients (44.0±12.3 y) rated their LBP intensity (0‐10) and disability (0‐24, Roland‐Morris; RM); thicknesses of transversus abdominis (TrA), obliquus internus (OI) and obliquus externus (OE) were determined at rest and during “abdominal‐hollowing” using M‐mode ultrasound. The TrA‐contraction ratio (TrA‐CR; thickness contracted/rest) and TrA‐preferential activation (TrA‐PA; TrA proportion of whole TrA+OI+OE thickness when contracted minus same at rest) were determined.

RESULTS: RM decreased from 8.9±4.7 to 6.7±4.3, and average pain, from 4.7±1.7 to 3.5±2.3 (each p<0.01). TrA‐CR increased from 1.35±0.12 to 1.41±0.17 (p=0.06) and TrA‐PA, from 0.051±0.018 to 0.056±0.025 (p=0.16). There was a non‐significant tendency (r=‐0.31,p=0.09) for worse baseline TrA‐PA to be associated with greater improvements in RM (but not pain). The individual improvements in RM/pain did not correlate significantly with the changes in either TrA‐CR or TrA‐PA (r=‐0.06‐0.20;p>0.27), though patients achieving a (clinically relevant) ≥30% reduction in RM tended to show greater improvement in TrA‐PA than did those with <30% reduction (0.013±0.023 vs 0.001±0.022, respectively;p=0.16).

CONCLUSION: There was some suggestion that patients with worse TrA function benefited more from the treatment. However, a good clinical outcome was not strongly dependent upon corresponding changes in abdominal muscle function. It is hence difficult to attribute the therapeutic results to any specific effects of the exercises on the trunk muscles. Larger groups of patients should be examined to clarify whether stabilisation exercises simultaneously have some sort of “global/general” effect, unrelated to abdominal muscle function.

ⓒ 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

다음검색
현재 게시글 추가 기능 열기
  • 북마크
  • 공유하기
  • 신고하기

댓글

댓글 리스트
맨위로

카페 검색

카페 검색어 입력폼