Policy debate(정책토론, 반대심문토론, cross-examination debate, Cross-X, CX, C-X) (제13회)
작성자류재수작성시간16.02.14조회수97 목록 댓글 0Policy debate(정책토론)
Policy debate is a form of speech competition in which teams of two advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government or security discourse. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate (sometimes shortened to Cross-X, CX, or C-X) because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech and the physical examination proceeding the first rebuttals. Affirmative teams generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution. The negative will generally prove that it would be better not to do the plan or that the opportunity costs to the plan are so great that it should not be implemented.
constructive speech and the physical examination | advocate for a resolution | |
the 3-minute questioning period | ||
constructive speech and the physical examination | advocate against a resolution | |
the 3-minute questioning period | ||
the first rebuttal | generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution | |
the first rebuttal | generally prove that it would be better not to do the plan or that the opportunity costs to the plan are so great that it should not be implemented. |
찬성 | 반대 |
1. 입론(논제에 대한 찬성 옹호) | |
2. 3분 질의시간 | |
3. 입론(논제에 대한 반대 옹호) | |
4. 3분 질의시간 | |
5. 첫 번째 반박 (보통 논제의 이행을 위한 제안으로서의 계획제시) | |
첫 번째 반박 (보통 그 계획을 실행하지 않는다거나 그 계획에 대한 기회비용이 너무 커서 실행되어서는 안된다고 입증) |