Extemporaneous debate(즉석토론, 준비없이 하는 토론)
Extemporaneous debate is a style that involves no planning in advance, and two teams with a first and second speaker. While a majority of judges will allow debaters to cite current events and various statistics (of which opponents may question the credibility) the only research permitted are one or more articles given to the debaters along with the resolution shortly before the debate. It begins with an affirmative first-speaker constructive speech, followed by a negative; then an affirmative and negative second-speaker constructive speech respectively. Each of these speeches is six minutes in length, and is followed by two minutes of cross examination. There is then an affirmative and negative first-speaker rebuttal, and a negative and affirmative second-speaker rebuttal, respectively. These speeches are each four minutes long. No new points can be brought into the debate during the rebuttals.
This style of debate generally centers around three main contentions, although a team can occasionally use two or four. In order for the affirmative side to win, all of the negative contentions must be defeated, and all of the affirmative contentions must be left standing. Most of the information presented in the debate must be tied in to support one of these contentions, or "signposted". Much of extemporaneous debate is similar to the form known as policy debate. One main difference, however, is that extemporaneous debate focuses less on the implementation of the resolution.
1. 의의
즉석토론(준비없이 하는 토론)은 사전 계획이 없고 두토론자를 잦는 두팀이 관여하는 형식이다. 다수의 판정단들이 반대자들이 신뢰성에 의문을 제기하는 시사와 다양한 통계에 대해서 인용하도록 허용하지만 허용되는 유일한 연구는 토론 직전에 토론자들에게 논제와 함게 제시된 둘 이상의 기사에 대해서이다. 즉석 토론의 대부분은 정책토론으로 알려직 형식과 유사하다. 그러나 하나의 주요한 차이는 즉석토론은 논제의 이행에 대해 그다지 초점을 두지 않는다.
2. 형식
찬성 | 시간 | 반대 | 시간 |
1. an affirmative first-speaker constructive speech 찬성 첫번째 발언자 입론 | 6분 | ||
2. a negative first-speaker constructive speech 반대 첫번째 발언자 입론 | 6분 | ||
3. cross examination 교차질의 | 2분 | ||
4. an affirmative second-speaker constructive speech 찬성 두번째 발언자 입론 | 6분 | ||
5. a negative second-speaker constructive speech반대 두번째 발언자 입론 | 6분 | ||
6. cross examination. | 교차질문 two minutes | 2분 | |
7. an affirmative first-speaker rebuttal 찬성 첫번째 발언자 반론 | 4분 | ||
| 8. a negative first-speaker rebuttal 반대 첫번째 발언자 반론 | 4분 | |
| 9. a negative second-speaker rebuttal 찬성 두번째 발언자 반론 each four minutes long | 4분 | |
10. an affirmative second-speaker rebuttal 반대 두번째 발언자 반론 | 4분 |
3. 주의 사항
반론중에는 새로운 논점이 들어갈 수 없음(No new points can be brought into the debate during the rebuttals).