3. CEDA(Cross Examination Debate Association) [제10회]

[류재수]

3. CEDA(Cross Examination Debate Association)

가. 개념(definition)

The Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA) (/sidə/ SEE-duh) is the largest intercollegiate policy debate association in the United States. Throughout the school year, CEDA sanctions over 60 tournaments throughout the nation, including an annual National Championship Tournament that brings together over 175 individual debate teams from across the nation to compete for a national championship.

CEDA(교차질문토론협회)는 미국에 있는 최대의 대학간 정책토론협회이다. 학년 내내 CEDA는 전국선수권을 겨루기 위해 전국적으로 175개 이상 개별토론팀이 모이는 연례 전국선수권토너먼트를 포함한 60개 이상 토너먼트를 인가한다.

나. 배경(background)

Founded in 1971 as the Southwest Cross Examination Debate Association, CEDA is now the primary national association promoting policy topic intercollegiate academic debate. In cooperation with the National Debate Tournament Committee and the American Debate Association, CEDA formulates the annual intercollegiate policy debate topic used in tournament competition throughout the nation.

CEDA acts as a tournament sanctioning agent, providing through its Constitution and By-Laws a framework for normalizing tournament practices and procedures. Throughout the tournament season, CEDA calculates the National Sweepstakes Standings, the national and regional rankings of member institutions based on compiled tournament results.

CEDA also functions as a professional association for scholars and teachers in the field of applied argumentation and debate. In addition to sponsoring scholarly programs on issues of interest to association members at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, CEDA has organized two indigenous scholarly assessment conferences: The 1991 St. Paul 20th Anniversary Assessment Conference, and the 2001 Tahoe Conference on Academic Debate. CEDA and the NDT co-sponsored a third professional conference, The 2009 National Developmental Conference at Wake Forest University. The 2009 Conference was directed by Dr. Alan Louden of Wake Forest University. The conference proceedings were edited by Louden and published by the International Debate Education Association Press as Navigating Opportunity: Policy Debate in the 21st Century.

CEDA also publishes Contemporary Argumentation and Debate: The Journal of the Cross Examination Debate Association, a refereed scholarly journal that serves as the primary outlet for monographs and essays addressing issues related to the theory and practice of academic debate. The journal is edited by Dr. Jennifer Bevan of Chapman University and Dr. Gordon Stables of the University of Southern California.

다. 내력(history)

For a number of years, CEDA employed a two-person team value debate format. CEDA utilized two topics each year, one governing the Fall Semester and the second governing the Spring Semester. Beginning with the 1995-96 season, however, CEDA has employed a single, year-long policy debate topic.

In 1996, the NDT and the American Debate Association agreed to employ the CEDA topic during their seasons, effectively unifying the organizations.

라. CEDA(cross examination debate association))

⑴ CEDA(cross examination debate association)(각팀 2명)(원형)

찬성		반대
1. 찬성측 ①토론자 입론	8분
		2. 반대측 ②토론자 반론	3분
		3. 반대측 ①토론자 입론	8분
4. 찬성측 ①토론자 반론	3분
5. 찬성측 ②토론자 입론	8분
		6. 반대측 ①토론자 반론	3분
		7. 반대측 ②토론자 입론	8분
8. 찬성측 ②토론자 반론	3분
		9. 반대측 ①토론자 반론	4분
10. 찬성측 ①토론자 반론	4분
		11. 반대측 ②토론자 반론	4분
12. 찬성측 ②토론자 반론	4분
	30분		30분

⑵ K-CEDA(각팀 4명)(한국식 변형의 하나)

과정	시간	찬성측				반대측
1. 찬성측 ①토론자 입론 First Affirmative Constructive Speech	4분	①	②	③	④	①	②	③	④
2. 반대측 ②토론자 질의및 반론 2N asks the 1A questions & First Negative Rebuttal Speech	4분						②
3. 반대측 ①토론자 입론 First Negative Constructive Speech	4분					①
4. 찬성측 ②토론자 질의및 반론 1A asks the 1N questions & First Affirmative Rebuttal Speech	4분		②
5. 숙의시간 Preparation Time	2분
6. 포괄 교차질의 Grand Crossfire	4분
7. 반대측 ③토론자 재반론 Second Negative Rebuttal Speech	2분							③
8. 찬성측 ③토론자 재반론 Second Affirmative Rebuttal Speech	2분			③
9. 반대측 ④토론자 최종변론 Final Negative Focus	2분								④
10. 찬성측 ④토론자 최종변론 Final Affirmative Focus	2분	④
11. 판정 및 강평 Judgment and Comment	2분