미국 합참에서 2019년 발행한 합동항공작전 관련 문서가 있네요.
https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp3_30.pdf
( 딥엘 번역본)
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA438397.pdf
미공군대학에서 발간된 논문인데 서지정보를 알 수가 없네요.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep13907.8?seq=2
1997년 미공군대학에서 발표된 문서입니다.
첨부파일첨부된 파일이 8개 있습니다.
다음검색
댓글
댓글 리스트-
작성자백선호 작성시간 24.01.09 ATO는 1991년 걸프전쟁 때 본격적으로 쓰였는데 베트남전쟁 때의 Frag와 비교해 보면 내용은 거의 비슷하다고 합니다.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA451239.pdf
In studying ATO for Desert Storm (figure 26), it becomes clear that the format for the Order has changed from the “Frag” of Vietnam, but the majority of the information remains constant: Mission number, Aircraft type and number, unit, Call sign, Ordnance, Target and Time over Target. There is some additional information such as Identification Codes used for electronically identifying aircraft, exact desired mean points of impact (DMPI) for weapons, -
작성자백선호 작성시간 24.01.09 and remarks used to convey specific instructions from the JFACC staff. Of note, missing in these orders is any conveyance of the commander’s intent for the attacks. In keeping with the AirLand ideals, airpower hit targets listed on the ATO requested by the Army (72 hours prior) beyond the FSCL or during CAS operations as directed by the Forward Air Controller. There was little need for the pilots/aircrews to know “why” or what effect was required for their sortie.